One of the few advantages to growing old is the opportunity
this presents to realize that the events we watch unfolding in real time will
someday be a history that folks will evaluate, argue over, and likely rewrite
time and again to suit their new realities. I remember my own internal debate
when the start of the second Gulf War rolled around, and I thought the timing
was all wrong. I figured we’d need to fight that war at some point, for Saddam
would eventually do something to us that even the worst of America’s critics
couldn’t excuse. Only then would going to war have been the “right” thing to
do.
But nobody ever gets credit for a preemptive strike, because
if successful, the ever-vocal critics will always claim it was unnecessary. I
knew that anyone who could recite, “It’s Bush’s Fault” would never agree with
his decision to start that war, even though they would be the first in line to
condemn the man when Saddam did finally attack us. Their criticism was the only
completely predictable element at the time.
I remember most of these same arguments during my
generation’s war, Viet Nam. We thought we had it all figured out, back then. We
got our information from some pretty reliable sources, and all of that
information told us the war was wrong, that our country was wrong, and
certainly that the men sent there to fight were really, really wrong. So I had
it all worked out. America was unequivocally wrong to fight that war.
Some time passed before I realized that the information I had
used to form my opinion on that war was a bit slanted, because the pretty
reliable sources I relied upon were reliable only to the degree that they
always criticized this country. They were not reliably correct, but merely
consistent in their opinion.
In the four decades subsequent to that war, I’ve noted other
opinion, and viewed previously unavailable information, and I’ve also had time
to think. For myself.
For example, that photo of the crying Vietnamese girl burned
by napalm, walking naked down the dirt lane, black smoke plume behind, that
Pulitzer Prize photo taken in 1972, has resurfaced for its 40th
anniversary. We all remember that photo for it was the personification of all
that America did during that war that was wrong. That photo of that little girl
proved that America was the bad guys and everything America did was bad. And
the pretty reliable sources all proclaimed this, and we took their clue and
criticized our country.
The story that follows that photo evolved over the decades. Now
we know that Phan Thi Kim Phuc, the nine year old girl injured in that attack
was treated for about a year in a South Vietnamese hospital before returning to
her home village. After the communist takeover, she wanted to go to school to
become a doctor, but the government wanted her for propaganda purposes so they
forced her to quit school and recite their monologues for the cameras.
Later, she traveled to Cuba to continue her education. She
now relates talking with the photographer who took that photo while she was in
Cuba, and she describes how careful she needed to be because the government was
always listening, and she feared punishment.
She married, and while flying from Moscow back to Cuba, she
fled the plane during a refueling stop in Canada and asked for asylum. She
later became a Canadian citizen.
So the poster child for the enemies of America finally was
able to flee communism and sought freedom in the West. And those nasty
Americans, who fought that war to try to stop the spread of communism around
the world, to help people like Phan Thi Kim Phuc find freedom, still face the
criticism of those would like to see more people living under communism. All of
this makes perfect sense, looking back on the history.
I have stated that we shall not have a true picture of the
value or harm of the second Gulf War until decades have passed. Those who have
led the criticism of Bush’s conduct of the war, the liberal professors, mass
media, and deceitful politicians who would sell out anyone to keep themselves
in office, are the same pretty reliable sources of information they were back
during Nam. If we are listening to them now, we won’t much like what our nation
does in that region. But what will we learn in the next 40 years about this
latest attempt to preserve our freedom? Might be, this country could turn out
to be “right” after all.
No comments:
Post a Comment